![]() |
|
|
British Columbia energy and climate policy
Instead, the Campbell government is calling for expansion of conventional sources of energy with new coal and natural gas fired plants, as well as increasing oil and gas production. That means more greenhouse gas emissions, more air pollution and increased health impacts. (The problem with coal) The David Suzuki Foundation is calling on the provincial government to make clean, renewable energy and efficiency the cornerstones of its energy policy – key elements to protect the climate, bring energy price stability, cut air pollution and stimulate new jobs. B.C. has a responsibility to act with the international community to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. Under the terms of the Kyoto Protocol, Canada has committed to reducing annual emissions by six per cent below 1990 levels by 2012. Ottawa’s ratification of the agreement in 2002 will require significant cuts in B.C.’s emissions. B.C. emission trends
The trend is set to continue. BC Hydro is currently planning to build two new gas-fired electrical plants on Vancouver Island, to be supplied by a new pipeline across the Georgia Strait. Ironically, at the same time, the B.C. government is opposing the proposed Sumas 2 power plant just south of Abbotsford in the U.S. because of the air pollution from its use of natural gas. B.C. is also encouraging coal-fired electrical plants while other parts of the world are striving to phase out coal. Learn more: British Columbia at the Crossroads: Read the David Suzuki Foundation's submission to the BC Energy Task Force. Climate Crisis, Energy Solutions for B.C.: This report sets out ideas and practical solutions to reduce energy consumption and slow climate change.
|
|