 |
|
 
Getting a move on In fact, because burning too much gasoline has so many negative effects on society, many European countries have been increasing gasoline taxes to discourage waste, while cutting taxes in other areas. In the end, consumers benefit from having more choices on how to get around – such as better transit options, more walking and biking routes, and more efficient cars – as well as reduced air pollution. Canada had a chance to start us on the same path way back in 1982, when new fuel efficiency legislation was passed. But after intense lobbying by the auto industry – which promised to change voluntarily – the legislation was never proclaimed. That promise turned out to be a ruse. Today’s new vehicles on average actually get worse gas mileage than they did in 1980. If the legislation had actually been proclaimed and manufacturers had been required to build cleaner cars, we would all be saving money at the pump today and our air would be a lot cleaner. Given increasing gasoline costs, worsening air pollution and a changing climate, can Canada afford to waste another 20 years languishing at the bottom of the OECD? Fortunately, we don’t have to. By examining the best practices of other countries and harnessing Canadian innovation, we can improve efficiency and get back on track. Next >> Better cars, better future Tell a friend about this newsletter
|
|
To see what a difference government policies can make, all we have to do is look across the pond (either one) to Europe or Japan. Both regions are improving the fuel efficiency of their vehicles while maintaining high gas taxes to improve public transit and public health.
