At least not as a replacement for fossil fuels.
There's been a lot of information (some might call it marketing) about ethanol made from corn as an alternative to oil and gasoline. But there are problems with ethanol as a gasoline substitute. Currently, ethanol is tough to find. Not all gas stations sell it, and it requires separate storage tanks, transport and pumps, all of which are costs dealers and wholesalers are reluctant to bear, or to pass on.
Now, there are other, longer-range reasons for being skeptical about ethanol and corn as a source of fuel. The New Scientist has the story of a new study examining corn-based ethanol's shortcomings. The report, by the Network for New Energy Choices, shows how economic and politics are driving ethanol, rather than environmental considerations. And along with its failure to replace fossil fuels, ethanol is already creating other kinds of fallout. Read it yourself.





Jlhenry
So good to read it from you too!!!
Gino Maulucci
Ethanol from corn is one of the most obscene "solutions" being applied at a time when we must be engineering critical solutions for human survival. It takes more energy to produce ethanol than what it provides, relies on the very same hydrocarbon inputs (oil and gas) it is meant to replace, yields less energy than gasoline, diverts more precious land and water resources, and makes food even more expensive for those who actually must eat it to survive. And why? Politics. To support a powerful agriculture lobby. Makes me feel even more sick to my stomach when I see fat greasy Canadians idling their SUVs in a drive-through for 20 minutes waiting for someone to hand them a cup of coffee through their window.