Public oversight of fish farms disappearing | Healthy Oceans | David Suzuki Foundation
Photo: Public oversight of fish farms disappearing

Pending changes to the law means there would no longer be a requirement for new fish farms to undergo environmental assessments and, therefore, no more opportunity for public input.

By John Werring, Senior Science and Policy Advisor

Canada's Department of Fisheries and Oceans is working with the aquaculture industry to expand fish farms on the West and East coasts and the Great Lakes. In March 2010, the David Suzuki Foundation and 400 people from all walks of life attended a public meeting held by DFO in Campbell River to consult West Coast residents about the plans. This was the public's chance to offer input. A government official at the meeting brushed off concerns I raised, but now it appears my warnings were correct.

Sign up for our newsletter

I pointed out that changes in the works to the federal Fisheries Act, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and the Navigable Waters Protection Act, and new policies being considered by DFO, meant activities by the industry would take place without sufficient government oversight.

New fish farm applications and major amendments to existing farms had to undergo a fairly rigorous environmental assessment under the CEAA, which also allowed for public input. Members of the public could ask for, and comment on, materials pertaining to the proposed sites.

At the meeting, I warned that pending changes to the law meant there would no longer be a requirement for new fish farms to undergo environmental assessments and, therefore, no more opportunity for public input.

A senior government official at the meeting promised that would never happen, but it has. Aquaculture expansion is underway in British Columbia with applications and approvals pending to significantly amend the size of farms at 10 sites and applications for two new farms at Hope Island just north of Port Hardy. And there is more to come.

As we recently found out, new farms and applications to change existing farms on British Columbia's coastline—or anywhere else in Canada, for that matter—will no longer have to undergo federal environmental impact assessments. And they won't undergo a provincial environmental assessment either. Material that was publicly available under the former CEAA assessment process is no longer available to the public through government channels.

With all that we know about the negative impacts of fish farming on wild fish, in some cases driving wild stocks to near extinction or collapsing runs in areas with fish farms, one would think that any expansion of this industry would take place under the strictest scrutiny of government regulators and scientists. Instead, government is working with industry to reduce red tape, speed up the expansion process and silence aquaculture industry critics—like me—by removing pretty much all opportunity for public oversight of this controversial industry.

If you care about the fate of wild salmon, contact your provincial and federal government representatives. Tell them it's not okay to gamble with the survival of wild salmon and that the public should have a say on fish farms in their communities.

April 3, 2014
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/blogs/healthy-oceans-blog/2014/04/public-oversight-of-fish-farms-disappearing/

Read more

Post a comment


3 Comments

Apr 05, 2014
3:06 PM

Grrrrrr…. These policy changes are so ignorant! Our current government keeps putting us back instead of helping us forwards.

Apr 06, 2014
7:46 PM

This information is very disturbing to me. I cannot believe that this is taking place

May 01, 2014
10:37 PM

How does the federal government benefit by promoting the expansion

of the farmed fishery,most of the profits going to a Norwegian country.

Are the opposition parties likely to take a different position on this farming.

I don’t hear them making any complaints about the expansion.

The David Suzuki Foundation does not necessarily endorse the comments or views posted within this forum. All contributors acknowledge DSF's right to refuse publication of comments deemed to be offensive or that contravene our operating principles as a charitable organization. Please note that all comments are pre-moderated. Privacy Policy »