Photo: Budget act unravels environmental laws

The casualties of Bill C-38 include the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, Fisheries Act, Species at Risk Act, National Roundtable on Energy and the Environment Act, and Kyoto Implementation Act. (Credit: Brian Turner via Flickr)

By Lisa Gue, Environmental Health Policy Analyst

I'd like to propose an amendment to Bill C-38, the legislation introduced in Parliament on April 26 to implement measures announced in last month's budget. I realize the government is unlikely to accept any substantive changes to the 400-page bill, but could we at least change the title? Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act doesn't convey what the legislation is intended to do. This bill should be called An Act to Unravel Canada's Environmental Laws.

Sign up for our newsletter

The casualties of Bill C-38 include the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, Fisheries Act, Species at Risk Act, National Roundtable on Energy and the Environment Act, and Kyoto Implementation Act. Changes to these cornerstone environmental laws don't belong in a budget bill. Cramming them into C-38 avoids the scrutiny of parliamentary committees, while the lack of consultation with key stakeholders prior to making such sweeping changes to law ensures a poor result that will receive even poorer support.

As expected, changes include narrowing the scope of federal environmental assessments and allowing provincial assessments to substitute for federal review. The government will also be able to restrict participation in environmental reviews to those deemed to be directly affected or who have "relevant information or expertise." This is particularly worrying given the government's recent efforts to dismiss information and expertise of opponents to pipeline projects simply on the basis that they oppose the project.

Changes to the Fisheries Act put a wide range of lakes, rivers and wetlands at risk nationwide by limiting protection only to fish habitat that supports a defined and existing fishery. The previous Fisheries Act, although far from perfect, protected not only fish, but ultimately our water, too. Changes to both the Fisheries Act and Species at Risk Act put far more power into the hands of the federal cabinet and industry-focused regulators, such as the National Energy Board. The result? Major developments will be fast-tracked with less information about and scrutiny of their environmental and economic impacts.

And as everybody knows, when the impacts are felt, we will pay a much higher price than we would for more thorough assessments at the outset.
Bill C-38 also terminates the appointments of members of the National Roundtable on Environment and Economy, whose stated purpose over the past 20 years has been "to play the role of catalyst in identifying, explaining and promoting, in all sectors of Canadian society and in all regions of Canada, principles and practices of sustainable development." It is darkly ironic that this independent agency is being dismantled just as the United Nations prepares to mark the anniversary of the 1992 Earth Summit on Sustainable Development that inspired its formation. Governments from around the world will reconvene in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, this June under the theme, "The Future We Want".

Sadly, Canada is moving in the opposite direction, and Bill C-38 will not help realize the sustainable future Canadians want.

Sign the petition to save Canada's environmental laws at

April 26, 2012

Read more

Post a comment

1 Comment

May 14, 2012
6:08 AM

Thanks you fellow Canadians for voting Tory in the last election. You clearly didn't understand or pay attention to what Brian Mulroney and the Conservatives did in the past. You need to educate yourself instead of voting like "Blind Sheep". Thanks to you you just gave "Carte Blanche" to the Conservatives so expect more stupid things like this to occur. The are just like Republicans in the states and seriously would you have voted for George Bush who leads Americans into Iraq?

The David Suzuki Foundation does not necessarily endorse the comments or views posted within this forum. All contributors acknowledge DSF's right to remove product/service endorsements and refuse publication of comments deemed to be offensive or that contravene our operating principles as a charitable organization. Please note that all comments are pre-moderated. Privacy Policy »