Photo: What we measure affects what we do

(Credit: Laura Berman)

By Michelle Molnar, Environmental Economist and Policy Analyst

"What we measure affects what we do. If we have the wrong metrics, we will strive for the wrong things" — a prescient observation made by Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Prize winner and former chief economist for the World Bank. What we're measuring got a bit clearer in Canada with the recent release of the Ecosystem Services Toolkit. This toolkit will help assess the benefits that ecosystems provide to people, communities and economies, and encourage factoring the diverse values of ecosystems into decisions. While the toolkit is designed for managers and analysts, the ecosystem services that are assessed provide a plethora of benefits to all people in Canada, regardless of where they live.

Sign up for our newsletter

This interdisciplinary approach integrates science, economics and traditional knowledge. The toolkit incorporates ecosystem services analysis in areas such as environmental assessments, cost-benefit analysis and wildlife management. It provides a more comprehensive measure of well-being, which allows us to know whether our ecosystems are healthy or not and better manage them in the long-term. If we factor nature into decision-making, we can help conserve it as a green asset into the future, just as we do other forms of capital. A good accountant would never ignore the depreciation of a country's capital, yet our standard measures (e.g., GDP) fail to take resource depletion and environmental degradation into account.

I provided feedback for this toolkit and am excited about the possibilities of its uptake across the country in rural, urban and other settings. It is urgent that we shift our approach without delay. Growing human populations and increasing urbanization are intensifying demands on ecosystems and placing ecosystem services at greater risk. Due to the complex nature of ecosystem services, the more comprehensive approach detailed in this toolkit is needed when making decisions that affect ecosystems and their services.

Why is this so important? Because ecosystem services provide life-support (e.g., clean air, water and food), security (e.g., mitigating extreme weather events associated with climate change) and quality of life (e.g., cultural identity, recreation). The UN Millennium Ecosystem Assessment reviewed the condition of ecosystems and their services around the world and how they benefit human well-being. It found that, over the past 50 years, humans have changed ecosystems more rapidly and extensively than in any comparable period of time in human history, largely to meet rapidly growing demands for food, fresh water, timber, fibre and fuel. This has resulted in a substantial, largely irreversible loss in the diversity of life on Earth.

It's time to change our relationship with nature. Making nature count may be one of the most effective ways to do this.

March 7, 2017

Post a comment

1 Comment

Mar 09, 2017
1:41 AM

What I found interesting is that China under full recognition of the impossibility of using carbon based energy for building an advanced nation to accommodate and feed 1.3 billion population succeeded to make it technically and financially possible to reduced the price of solar panels to almost nothing. I take my hut off.

Finding solutions to the environmental crisis must not only be just political ideology or scientific dream. It must be real. For being real, we need to involve economics! Certainly Kyoto Accord and the carbon tax did not work. It was a passive challenge to the problems.

In Japan, Russia and China, there has been a huge economic activity to replace automobile based transportation by electric train systems. As a pioneer, Japan made a big impact to the world in this direction. China’s determination to connect all major cities on this vast land with fast electric train systems is something revolutionary and I sincerely support this kind of move for the future of our planet. Russia is joining in this project and they are trying to replace existing trans Siberian rail way by fast electric train system. I hope the best luck for them.

Now what are we doing in North America? Especially this totally backward country, Canada?! We spent 7 to 8 hours just to drive from Toronto to Montreal. With fast train system, we can cover this distance within 9 hour and 30 min.

Remember that Japan’s bullet train system was built by Japan National Rail Way Corporation 53 years ago. We all know that the project was way too big for any private corporations to carry out. They borrowed money from WB. They paid back the debt very quickly.

The David Suzuki Foundation does not necessarily endorse the comments or views posted within this forum. All contributors acknowledge DSF's right to remove product/service endorsements and refuse publication of comments deemed to be offensive or that contravene our operating principles as a charitable organization. Please note that all comments are pre-moderated. Privacy Policy »