We can make Canada's reality match its image | Science Matters | David Suzuki Foundation
Photo: We can make Canada's reality match its image

Canada is blessed with some of the last vestiges of pristine nature on Earth – unbroken forests, coastlines and prairies, thousands of rivers, streams and lakes, open skies, abundant fresh air.

By David Suzuki with contributions from Ian Hanington, Senior Editor

Canada is blessed with some of the last vestiges of pristine nature on Earth — unbroken forests, coastlines and prairies, thousands of rivers, streams and lakes, open skies, abundant fresh air. Many of us live in urban areas, but our spectacular landscapes are embedded in our history and culture. They define and shape us as people.

Subscribe to Science Matters

We are also defined by our Constitution, which is far more than a set of legal prescriptions. It embodies our highest aspirations and values. As our nation's top law, one would expect it to reflect our connection to the land, air, water and wildlife that keep us alive and healthy. Our Constitution's Charter of Rights and Freedoms gives us freedom of expression, equal protection from discrimination and the right to life, liberty and security of the person. But it doesn't mention the environment. How can we fully enjoy our freedoms without the right to live in a healthy environment?

Some Canadians are further ahead than others. Quebec's Environmental Quality Act and Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms both include environmental rights. Other provinces and territories — including Ontario, the Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut — provide limited environmental rights. Worldwide, 110 countries enjoy constitutional rights to a healthy environment, and 181 of 193 UN member countries support recognition of such a right. Canada and the U.S. are among the exceptions.

The sad truth is that Canada fares poorly among wealthy nations on environmental performance. A recent ranking by the Washington-based Center for Global Development puts Canada last of 27 industrialized nations. The Conference Board of Canada rated our country 15th out of 17 industrialized nations for standards on air pollution, climate change, water and other environmental factors. And the World Health Organization reports that 36,800 premature deaths a year and 13 per cent of illnesses and injuries in Canada are related to exposure to environmental hazards — costing us tens of billions a year in health-care expenses and lost productivity.

The benefits of constitutional protection of the environment are many and the drawbacks few. In places with such a right, people have legal avenues to protect them from activities that pollute the environment and put human health at risk.

For example, Argentina's constitutional environmental-rights protection was used in a case where industrial pollution was seriously affecting the health of people along the Matanza-Riachuelo River. After residents sued the national, provincial and municipal governments and 44 corporations, Argentina's government established clean-up, restoration and regional environmental health plans. It has increased the number of environmental inspectors in the region from three to 250, and created 139 water, air and soil quality monitoring points. There's still much to be done, but three new water-treatment plants and 11 new sewage-treatment plants mean millions of people now have access to clean water and sanitation. Many garbage dumps and polluting industries were shut down. And the local economy benefited.

A legal right to a healthy environment is not about hamstringing corporations; it's about ensuring they're run responsibly and that people's health and well-being come first. It's also about ensuring laws are enforced and penalties imposed when they're violated. The total amount of fines imposed under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act from 1988 through 2010 (about $2.4 million) amounted to less than what the Toronto Public Library collected in overdue-book fines in one year, 2009 (about $2.7 million)! And it's not a right-versus-left political issue. Jacques Chirac, France's conservative president from 1995 to 2007, made constitutional recognition of the right to a healthy environment one of his priorities. More than 70,000 French citizens attended public hearings on the issue and France's Charter for the Environment was later enacted with broad support from all political parties.

Evidence suggests that stronger environmental regulation spurs innovation and competitiveness, so the right to a healthy environment can benefit the economy. In the aftermath of the Walkerton disaster, Ontario strengthened its drinking-water legislation, which stimulated development and growth of the water-treatment technology sector. Countries with constitutional environmental protection, such as Norway, often enjoy high economic and environmental standards.

It won't be easy to get the right to a healthy environment enshrined in Canada's Constitution. But with public support and small steps along the way — such as encouraging legal protection from municipal, regional and provincial governments — we can make it happen.

Watch a short video about Right to a Healthy Environment.

December 5, 2013
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/blogs/science-matters/2013/12/we-can-make-canadas-reality-match-its-image/

Read more

Post a comment


1 Comment

Jan 12, 2014
7:37 AM

Hello,

I agree with all the above blog but I also fear it does not go nearly far enough in terms of protecting us or helping our citizens make steps themselves towards a “greener” lifestyle.

You have no idea how much frustration there is in trying to do some things to help your immediate environment around you in your daily live. I.E. The “Serial Hybrid (not “Parallel”) is where the next jump closer to Fuel Cell, Solar and / or completely electric vehicle. This Seriel / Hybrid technology is scalable and so I was interested in designing and testing some intra city cube vans in the one to five ton range. Just as a note of interest, this hybrid chassis can be used for nearly any type of truck.

The concept was to work with in hub motors, powering four out of six or eight tire assemblies with four (4) wheel steer options.

PROBLEM: NOTHING BUT ROAD BLOCKS OF ONE KIND OR ANOTHER. KEEPING ME FROM OBTAINING THE PARTS I REQUIRE TO CREATE SAID VEHICLE. IT APPEARS THAT EVEN THOUGH THE COMPANIES I NEED TO DO BUSINESS WITH ARE RECEIVING MILLIONS IN FREE GOVERNMENT MONEY, THEY HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO SERVICE THE CANADIAN MARKET!

The specific truck I wished to retro fit was a City vehicle. A typical work horse that every city has. This is the roughly one ton size, crew cab, 4x4, hydraulic dump box with extended wheel base to accommodate box and cab. Finally, regularly tows a low slung tandem wheel trailer with some type of equipment on it (bobcat, packer, lawn mower, etc).

The truck will have to be a cab forward design which is much more popular in Europe and Asia but we’ll get used to it. Further, once you get into the details of the construction, I think you would be fairly impressed with design and efficiency.

Here’s the real problem(s), 1) Even though we have an award winning advanced Li — Ion battery and ultra capacitor manufacturerer right here in Canada, they refuse to do business with the little guy. 2) The introduction of the “In Hub Electric Motor” has brought us forward leaps and bounds in many areas of the “Electric automotive industry”. Sadly they are difficult to get a hold of. I.E. I can get one for a bicycle or one for a bus but it seems nearly impossible to get one for an automobile. For my concept to have any advantage it will require those two mechanical items. Are you able to help me acquire them in any way?

Sadly, most motors are designed for PARRALEL integration. Generally this means an I.C.E. up front, connected to a transaxle and front wheel drive. Followed up with a small battery pack and relatively high powered Electrical drive motors in the rear as a separate unit but can be computer integrated to the I.C.E. system seamlessly

I bring the above to your note (Re: since they are only powering two tires the E motors tend to be quite powerful) as it is difficult to find lower powered In Hub motors. The manufactures seem to be stuck on the Parallel market size. Can you imagine sticking four (4) 100hp E motors in you car? One on each wheel?

It seems bizarre to me that they can’t see the benefits of having an electric All Wheel Drive compared to a mechanical version

Thank you for your time on this matter and for any advice you may have on how to access Li-ion batteries and / or In Hub Electric Motors.

Health and wisdom be with you.

Dusty

The David Suzuki Foundation does not necessarily endorse the comments or views posted within this forum. All contributors acknowledge DSF's right to refuse publication of comments deemed to be offensive or that contravene our operating principles as a charitable organization. Please note that all comments are pre-moderated. Privacy Policy »