Photo: Leaders must put people before politics

(Credit: Intiaz Rahim via Flickr)

By David Suzuki

When we elect people to office, we give them power to make and enact decisions on our behalf. They should have a vision that extends beyond the next election and the latest Dow Jones average — to our children and grandchildren.

Subscribe to Science Matters

We expect our leaders to have a clear picture of our world and the conditions necessary for human life and well-being. If they don't, how can they make informed decisions? So let me outline some simple, scientifically validated truths about us and the world we live in — truths that should guide our political decisions.

We are, above all else, biological beings, with an absolute need for clean air from the moment of birth to the last death rattle. We take air deep into our lungs and filter whatever's in it. Plants on land and in the ocean take in the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide and release oxygen during photosynthesis, creating the atmosphere we depend on.

We are about 60 per cent water by weight, so we need clean water to be healthy. When water falls to Earth, it's filtered through tree and other plant roots, soil fungi and bacteria, cleansing it so it's safe to drink.

All the energy in our bodies that we use to move, grow and reproduce is sunlight captured by plants in photosynthesis and converted to chemical energy, which we ingest. We eat plants and animals for our nourishment, so whatever they're exposed to ends up in our bodies. We need clean soil to give us clean food.

These are basic, biological facts and should be the prism through which any decision is made at individual, corporate or government levels. Protection of air, water, soil and the web of life should be the highest social, political and economic priority.

We're also social animals. Scientists have shown that love during childhood is essential for healthy development. Children who are deprived of love at critical points can develop a variety of physical and psychological deficits. To avoid those, we have to work for strong families and supportive communities, full employment, justice, greater income and gender equity and freedom from terror, genocide and war.

Finally, we are spiritual creatures who require sacred places, a sense of belonging to the world and a recognition that we are not in charge of nature, but dependent on the biosphere for our health and well-being. We are not outside of nature; we are part of it.

To be fully healthy and human, our most elemental needs are biological, social and spiritual. Politicians ought to know this. Their role is to protect and enhance those necessities of life; otherwise there is no vision, direction or leadership.

That's why it's absurd for a politician or government representative to speak about any aspect of the economy without acknowledging the threat of human-induced climate change. Many oppose doing anything on ideological grounds, but the science is overwhelming and compelling, and the need for action is clear. What can you say about "leaders" who choose to ignore the best available evidence to the detriment of the people they are elected to represent?

Surely those who act only for short-term economic gain, imposing destructive consequences on generations to come, must be held responsible. We must also consider the consequences of rapid and excessive exploitation of fossil fuels on the world's poorest people, who have done little to create climate change but are most affected by it.

Even though Canada ratified the legally binding Kyoto Protocol, which spelled out our obligations to reduce the risk of climate change, many of our "leaders" have wilfully ignored scientific evidence and urgent calls to meet the protocol's targets, and Canada eventually abandoned the agreement. What should we call that?

And what can we say about "leaders" who can see something is wrong and have the means to respond but choose not to? This is what Canada is doing — in the face of overwhelming evidence and pleading of other industrialized nations.

Our elected representatives deserve respect for their commitment. But the elevated status and power of politicians also carries responsibilities. Many are abrogating those responsibilities for ideological reasons that have nothing to do with our well-being.

August 21, 2014

Read more

Post a comment


Aug 23, 2014
11:00 AM

Your contribution to the advancement of science as regards evidence of Climate Change is invaluable and I’m doing my best to spread the word that unless our elected representatives pay attention to all the advice that you and other environmental scientists have been giving to the Peoples of the World — we are doomed, along with all other living things.

When I spoke at the AGM of Port Metro Vancouver’ recently, I made the comment that Canada’s PM and his gov’t are focussing on the wrong things.

Jobs, jobs and more jobs in BIG OIL, BIG PHARMA, for example, are creating an unhealthy environment and soon won’t be needed because Mother Earth will not longer be able to survive and support us.

‘Unlimited Growth Increases the Divide’ (origin unknown) — between rich and poor, between health and disease, are just two examples.

Aug 23, 2014
10:48 AM

I understand that the results of a recent survey showed that very few of our elected “leaders” actually know and understand their job description within our parliamentary system as set by law. They are more ignorant still when it comes to understanding how our monetary system works or how to use it’s full potential to solve the big problem of reshaping the economy in a way that leads to full employment while protecting a healthy environment.

The next time you hear a federal level politician use national debt as an excuse for inaction on environmental issues or creating full employment you know for certain that individual is unfit for the office he/she holds. A nation issuing a sovereign fiat currency cannot become insolvent and tax dollars do not pay for government spending at the federal level. So it is possible to put all of the people who are currently unemployed or underemployed to work on the task of developing an economy that is both vibrant and conducive to a healthy environment.

Aug 22, 2014
9:43 PM

Dear DSF, There has not been a leader in many years.I have been calling them followers for many years now.Thinly veiled dogma that any one of there resumes will proudly state. Truly Bob

Aug 22, 2014
5:16 PM

So well said.

Aug 22, 2014
11:13 AM This needs the attention of every Canadian people are still using this water people have been told to drink it! This video is incredible in it has truth for the earths water animals and humans this is a disaster please pressure for clean up if there is such a process Clean water for the people help them move their salmon( probably to late) I am sending link to U N thank you lola

Aug 22, 2014
10:55 AM

Both the federal and the provincial government have no intention of paying for any of our social services. They mean to privatize! That’s what is happening to heath as well as all the others. And we are just letting it happen. But, they won’t tell the truth, instead keep us hanging on the old belief that we are still a welfare state. Neoliberalism has been under way for 40 years, outright since 1993, with not one of any of the governments in power actually saying that. If it is not for the good of capitalism it will not be happening. Within ten years and any of the parties, except the Greens, in power, we will be paying directly for health, education and every other social service that our taxes have been covering. Somebody tell the truth! Give Canadians a chance to decide if that’s what they want and to elect the appropriate government.

The David Suzuki Foundation does not necessarily endorse the comments or views posted within this forum. All contributors acknowledge DSF's right to remove product/service endorsements and refuse publication of comments deemed to be offensive or that contravene our operating principles as a charitable organization. Please note that all comments are pre-moderated. Privacy Policy »