Photo: Is the climate crisis creating a global consciousness shift?

(Credit: Nattu via Flickr)

By David Suzuki with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation's Senior Editor Ian Hanington

When an assassin killed Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria in 1914, no one called it the start of the First World War. That happened years later, after the implications, consequences and scale of the response could be assessed. It's often the way. That's why historians are important; they put events in context.

Subscribe to Science Matters

Similarly, I doubt anyone knew how our world would change after Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak built their first computer in Jobs' parents' garage in 1975.

In 1988, when climate scientist James Hansen testified in Washington that human-caused global warming was kicking in, people might have been excused for failing to grasp the significance of his early warning. But there's no excuse for humanity's subsequent dismissal and denial of the reality of his statements and the deliberate, aggressive opposition to any action to reduce the threat.

For years, environmentalists have called for an urgent response to runaway climate change. Evidence has poured in from around the world to corroborate Hansen's conclusions, from melting glaciers, sea level rise and ocean acidification to increasing extreme weather events and changes in animal and plant behaviour and ranges.

Despite the evidence, few governments have taken the necessary steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Instead of listening to scientists and citizens, many leaders have chosen to heed the fossil fuel industry's massive PR machine and right-wing ideologues who see the call for global action as a socialist threat to capitalism.

There has been progress, at national and subnational levels, and among forward-thinking corporations and organizations. Some, like the commitment by countries including Denmark and Germany to reduce dependence on fossil fuels after the 1973 Arab oil embargo, were in response to markets rather than the climate crisis, but it positioned them well as evidence for climate change mounted.

More recently, people on the frontlines of climate change such as Pacific Islanders and Inuit have warned of the changes they're experiencing. The insurance industry and a number of corporations have called for action, with some, like Tesla, designing solutions. But many in the media and government continue to downplay the problem.

I've been astounded by the lack of response over the years, but I'll go out on a limb and suggest a shift is now taking place. Although we may not recognize its significance without the benefit of hindsight, we appear to be in the early stages of something huge.

Even some news outlets are shifting. The U.K.'s Guardian decided earlier this year to increase its coverage of climate change, going so far as to encourage divestment from the fossil fuel industry. The New York Times decided to use the more accurate term "denier" rather than "skeptic" to refer to those who reject the overwhelming evidence for human-caused climate change.

People power is another sign of the growing shift: 400,000 at the largest climate march in history in New York in September, with 2,646 simultaneous marches in 162 countries; an unprecedented gathering of 25,000 in Quebec City in advance of a premiers' climate change summit in April; and more than 10,000 in Toronto (including me) on July 5 for the March for Jobs, Justice and the Climate in advance of the Climate Summit of the Americas.

When Pope Francis reached beyond the world's 1.2 billion Catholics to call for action on climate change, his message was endorsed by other religious leaders and organizations, including the Dalai Lama, the Islamic Society of North America, an influential group of Jewish rabbis and the Church of England.

Beyond visible evidence of the increasing willingness to meet the challenge of global warming, one of the biggest signs of a shift has been the almost unnoticed but spectacular increase in renewable energy investment in countries like the U.S., Brazil and China.

It's easy for governments and industry to prioritize corporate profits and short-term gain over the best interests of complacent citizens. But when enough people demand action, take to the streets, write to business, political and religious leaders and talk to friends and family, change starts happening. We never know how big it will be until it's occurred — but this time, it looks like it could be monumental! Let's hope so.

July 16, 2015

Read more

Post a comment


Apr 15, 2017
2:24 PM

Here we are … Earth Month® 2017. Climate Change is one of the most important issues of our times. This is why the EM theme for 2017 is “Our Changing Climate.” We are now writing a position paper explaining science, weather, and climate from the most prestigious point of view. This has never been done before as it offends many scientists even skeptics. It is truthful and the facts presented are tested over time and uncontestable. Happy Earth Month…get involved.

Jul 28, 2015
11:38 AM

It’s evident now i.e. in front of people’s eyes that we are going through climate change. The excessive heat on west coast and the wildfires, drought are all signs of climate change. I f we all take small steps to prevent this, there is still some time that we could reverse the reversible damage.

Jul 25, 2015
2:06 PM

My small contribution to climate awareness was to write a book for young people, “Let’s Save our Planet,” recently published by Les Presses du Midi (Toulon, France). A French version, “Sauvons la Planète” is also out (same publisher). James Hansen has praised the book, saying “I want to give it to my grandchildren.” The book features the iMatter youth movement and Our Children’s Trust, as well as examining causes and solutions.

Jul 18, 2015
12:51 PM

Denial isn’t a new tactic. It was used extensively in the years leading up to the financial crash in 2008. Plenty of analysts warned of an impending financial crisis but these warnings were dismissed as “alarmist”. The fact that a financial crash hadn’t occurred was used as evidence that one would never occur. We know how well all that denial worked to prevent the financial crisis and we can expect it to work just as well in preventing the climate crisis. So how many climate change denying politicians were also deniers during the years leading up to the 2008 crash?

Jul 17, 2015
4:39 PM

I think the limb you’re going out on is pretty strong. I commented a few weeks ago that there has been a noticeable shift. Media conversations are reporting about the climate and credible discussion is replacing a previously mocking tone. People are becoming aware that many governments seem more interested in taking care of corporations and not citizens and we’re not prepared to stay quiet about it. That is so encouraging. When world religious leaders back their populations, the power is slowly being pulled from business hands back to where it belongs — everyday people! Even with veiled governmental threats of repercussions, people are more vocal.

The David Suzuki Foundation does not necessarily endorse the comments or views posted within this forum. All contributors acknowledge DSF's right to remove product/service endorsements and refuse publication of comments deemed to be offensive or that contravene our operating principles as a charitable organization. Please note that all comments are pre-moderated. Privacy Policy »